Case 4.2: HIV and a Researcher’s Duty to Warn (p. 185)

What moral principles seem to be in conflict in this scenario?

How would you resolve the conflict?

Suppose John’s only options are either to maintain confidentiality or violate it by revealing the subject’s HIV status to her boyfriend (the subject refuses to notify him voluntarily).

What should John do, and on what grounds could either action be justified?

Suppose that state law prohibits researchers from revealing a subject’s HIV status.

Would this fact change you judgment?
Should any such legal fact change your judgment?

Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.